Marking guidelines:
Essay 1. (email me by Wednesday 5 April at the latest, please) To
what extent does media ownership have an impact on the successful
distribution of media products in the area that you have studied? (2015)
Essay 2. (email me by Wednesday 12 April at the latest, please)
"Successful media products depend as much upon marketing and
distribution to a specific audience as they do upon good production
practices." To what extent would you agree with this statement, within
the media area you have studied? (2011)
Essay 3. (I will set you as a test on the first day back) The increase in
hardware and content in media industries has been significant in recent
years. Discuss the effect that this has had on institutions and
audiences in the media area you have studied. (2014)
Essay 1 Guidelines
Points that you will cover:
Sentence 1: I have studied the film industry.
Sentence 2: I understand media ownership to refer to the fact that the Hollywood 'Big Six' dominate the film industry. There
are increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries
already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of
firms, such as Disney (The Avengers, director Joss Whedon 2012) and Universal (Jurassic World, director Colin Trevorrow 2015). The job of the distributor is to get films to audiences, to make audiences aware of the texts through publicity and to place the films for consumption.
Point 3: Media ownership and budgets influence how successful distribution is
for a text as the larger the budget, the more successful the
distribution for a media institution. Additionally, digital technology
has lessened the cost of distribution compared to its physical formats.
It must
also be recognised that some media companies (such as conglomerates)
invest most heavily in advertising campaigns (as a business model) which
guarantees success.
Point 4: I intend to contrast the distribution strategies of a very low-budget British film Tortoise In Love (director Guy Browning 2012) as well as Working Title's Legend (director Helgeland, 2015) with 'Big Six' productions, Jurassic World and The Avengers.
Case Study 1: I take first Tortoise In Love as a case study as it is an example of a crowd-sourced film whose low budget and lack of big-name stars meant that distributors were not interested. Initially only the film's Facebook page acted as a means of publicity before the BFI became involved through its P&A fund, securing a release at a premiere in Leicester Square in May 2012.
(Below are some extracts but you should go through the PDF yourself to re-familiarize yourself with the case)
TIL was therefore an interesting model of traditional distribution methods with a twist; it shows the tough market place for indie films.
Working Title is an example of a very successful independent film company which operates out of the UK but whose parent company is NBC Universal. It can green-light films up to $US35 million but usually consults with Working Title's parent company NBC Universal. It has the double advantage of artistic independence and financial security. To market Legend (director Helgeland, 2015), the first image of the film was published in June 2014, featuring Hardy as both the Kray twins. A
promotional poster attracted publicity because it made a two-star review from The Guardian appear to be a four- or five-star review by placing the two stars between the heads of the Krays. Legend
grossed $41,636,816 worldwide. Helgeland attended the Cannes Film
Festival to promote the film and find buyers, with distribution rights
going to StudioCanal. WT released a teaser trailer on its website,
linked to FB, Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram feeds, followed by an
official full UK trailer. All publicity played on the 'legendary'
narrative (hence the film title) of the infamous Kray twins, glamorizing
their stories though the sophisticated night-life settings ("London's
going to be the Las Vegas of Europe"), their romances and the powerful
atmospheric photography. In each case, the puff "From the Academy
Award-winning screenwriter of LA Confidential and Mystic River"
targeted US audiences. The campaign capitalised on Tom Hardy’s dual
roles and the viral Guardian review that was generated by StudioCanal's
clever but deceitful poster in which it placed the poor two-star review
by The Guardian's Benjamin Lee between the heads of the Kray
twins to make it seem like a 5 star review. Lee generated viral
publicity for the film through his article drawing attention to this "How my negative review of Legend was spun into movie marketing gold".
Target Media were successful in handling marketing : 'The Outdoor campaign focused on bringing to life the old Kray
stomping ground as well as exhausting large digital formats in key
cities that would ‘take over’ London, much like the Krays did. While TV
kicked off awareness in cherry picked environments (Manchester V.
Chelsea and Rugby Live Internationals England V. France: as well as the
trial of Jimmy Rose for a more balanced audience), we complemented this
with breakout press formats, such as the Metro Cascade (a new format to
the market) and the Telegraph Archive page. To make sure that we
communicated effectively with the commuter belt, Time Out wraps and
Shortlist DPS’s were used also. Further partnerships with the Telegraph
meant that co-branded content and competitions made Legend more
accessible and excitable for our audience to engage with.
Digital also played a crucial role in starting conversations on
social platforms and allowing sharability. Kicking off with Cinemagraphs
to tease then eventually revealing the full trailer. Partnering up with
Shazam we were able to tie up all media by enabling outdoor, press and
TV to be Shazamable (also brand new to the market)- leading users to
the Legend hub where more content could be unlocked and tickets could be
booked. The display aspects of the campaign were rich formats across
key networks: these also included mobile interstitials and special
builds.
Legend opened at number one in the UK box office bringing in a staggering £5.2m in the opening weekend.'
Next point: There are other distribution methods for indie films, such as those made possible by Web 2.0 such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, iTunes, BitTorrent Bundle and Vimeo on Demand. Kickstarter is also a crowd sourced funding website which offers newer
opportunities to fund and distribute film.
Most
of my own film viewing is done online. According to the FDA's 2017
handbook, audiences visit the cinema 2.6 times a year and although
cinema going is still robust, it is a little down on the previous year.
With
Web 2.0., 3D cinema, viewing online, piracy and the future of online
distribution (crowd sourced movies and the role of You Tube), the
industry faces future challenges. There are the rapid changes taking
place in this industry from the traditional ways of distributing film
through to the digital formats used today. Online platforms are now
being used to distribute and market films
(Netflix) and the relative success that different films texts had with
these. For example, Netflix and Amazon were outbidding all the major
movie studios at Sundance in January 2016. Amazon outbid Hollywood
heavyweights Fox and Universal for the rights to distribute Manchester by the Sea—a Sundance debut. Amazon paid $10 million for the film, and gave it a traditional
theatrical run to ensure it qualified for all the major awards. The film then streamed on Amazon Video.
Case study 2: The Avengers
Its distribution depended on digital technology. Disney dismissed all three of Marvel's marketing top men to bring their
functions in-house. The trailer, which debuted exclusively on iTunes Movie Trailers,
was downloaded over 10 million times in its first 24 hours, breaking
the website's record for the most-viewed trailer. A second full-length
trailer was released on iTunes in February 2012, reaching a record
13.7 million downloads in 24 hours.The theatrical trailers of The Avengers appeared with many films, including Mission Impossible - Ghost Protocol, 21 Jump Street and The Hunger Games.
Not all marketing was digitally driven; the build-up to The Avengers
drew on retail partnerships, such as product tie-ins and Disney issued
two limited edition comic book series. Synergy is illustrated by its
wide range of retail partnerships. In total Marvel and its
parent-company Disney secured an estimated $100 million in worldwide
marketing support for The Avengers. So not all marketing was digitally driven; the build-up to The Avengers
drew on retail partnerships, such as product tie-ins: set photos of
Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) were released driving a new model Acura
car. Marvel partnered with JADS, a fragrance company, to promote The Avengers
with character-based fragrances. The announcement was just ahead of the
Toy Industry Association's annual exhibition, where representatives
held a sampling booth of the products. Other promotional partners
included Dr Pepper, Harley Davidson, Hershey chocolates, Land O'Frost
lunchmeats, Oracle, Red Baron pizza, Symantec, Visa and Wyndham Hotels.
Disney does not generally promote through fast food outlets.
Another
example of how film distribution uses the synergy possible with digital
technology to reach national, international and global audiences is
this year's James Bond Skyfall for which Heineken television
advertisements were constructed as mini Bond action adventure films
packed with spectacle and thrills thanks to CGI. Heineken was of many
luxury brands and revenue sources whose association with the film
cross-promoted it, such as Aston Martin, Sony and Coca Cola, whilst Sky
launched a dedicated TV channel.
Case Study 3 (alternative for you, or additional if you can write a lot quickly) Jurassic World.
Please look at the Prezi made by one of last year's students from material given to me by Gareth Edwards of Universal. Give it a minute to load.
Essay 2 Guidelines
Points that you will cover:
Sentence 1: I have studied the film industry.
Sentence 2:Here, FIRST UNPACK THE
TERMS: ‘By production practices, I understand production values, digital distribution and production, CGI, choice of
genre, casting, choice of film techniques and so on. I intend to discuss this
question with reference to Hollywood blockbusters which target global audiences,
British film with national and international target audiences and, finally,
micro budget films with niche audiences.
As case studies, I plan to use Jurassic World, Avengers Assemble and Beauty and the Beast and to illustrate the Hollywood
4S mega franchise model and how global audiences are targeted through synergetic
distribution methods. I will also refer to how Iron Man 3 used
a range of methods to target the Chinese market, the second largest in
the world, and why the success of Western production practices looks
like slowing down in this market.
Next, I intend to refer to Legend (a Working Title film), Sunset Song and '71 as examples of British
production practices and the needs of national cinema to serve national
audiences with a diverse range of film genres. I will also cover micro budget
films with niche audiences, such as Tortoise In Love. (See the notes for the previous essay above about Legend)
Finally, I will consider what trends indicate about
future practices in the film industry, based on my own film viewing preferences and that of my peers, as well as what I have noticed in the
press about the platforms like YouTube, Netflix and LoveFilm as well as the
interesting reasons given by Peter Jackson for his choice of using 48 fps for The Hobbit to lure
younger audiences away from handheld devices and back into cinemas.’
Case studies (to get you started)
I would like to contrast a Disney film Beauty and the Beast and an independent UK film '71.
Beauty and the Beast (2017)
- its website clearly demonstrates how Disney uses horizontal integration in its marketing as
the banner shows links to its TV, DVDs, games, merchandising, live
events, theme parks, travel company, cruise line, videos, competitions
and DisneyLife.
- Beauty
took $350 M on its opening weekend. It had the biggest ever opening
weekend for a PG-rated film, and notched up the seventh best opening
overall. This marks Disney's best opening for a live action remake yet -
beating The Jungle Book, Cinderella and Alice in Wonderland.
- Disney can afford to use big names such as Emma Watson , Emma Thompson, Ewan McGregor and so on.
- Is the film an example of Dalecki's '4 S' model? Yes: whilst not a sequel, Disney’s Beauty and the Beast is a live-action re-telling of the
studio’s animated classic which refashions the classic characters from
the tale as old as time for a contemporary audience.
- Budget $ 160 M, the most expensive musical ever made
'71 (2014)
- By contrast, '71 is
a low-budget national film but one that aimed at international
audiences as its subject (radicalization of young men during the
Troubles in Northern Ireland) was of universal interest. Plot summary here.
- Jack O'Connell had previously attracted critical acclaim for Unbroken (2014)
appearing as a prisoner of war in a Japanese war camp. Directed by
Angelina Jolie, this film made O'Connell known to an American audience.
- 71 won Best Director at the 2014 British Independent Film Awards, after receiving nine nominations. The National Board of Review named '71 one of the top 10 independent films of 2015.
- Budget, £8.1 million. Box office, $3.2 million.
Here is an article that I wrote some time ago that has been reproduced by Haggerston Media (without crediting me).